<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for byrd ensemble, directed by Markdavin Obenza</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.byrdensemble.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.byrdensemble.com</link>
	<description>a Seattle-based professional vocal ensemble</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 May 2012 01:09:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Choral blend, a better way to get it (with AUDIO SAMPLES) by markdavinobenza</title>
		<link>http://www.byrdensemble.com/choral-blend-a-better-way-to-get-it-with-audio-samples/#comment-1929</link>
		<dc:creator>markdavinobenza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 May 2012 01:09:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.byrdensemble.com/?p=905#comment-1929</guid>
		<description>On a side note, I&#039;ve spent some time with people that claim to be &quot;tone deaf,&quot; and you know, from my experience, even those people can match pitch, it just takes a little extra time. So, I&#039;m not sure &quot;tone deaf&quot; is the right phrase to describe them. It seems to help if you sing with them, kind of guiding them around the notes. 

I also think ear training is so important. I&#039;m glad you found the examples helpful.

Yes, accompanied singing is great! I really like singing unaccompanied. After you&#039;ve sung that way for a while, it feels really strange to go back and sing with a piano doubling the parts, the tuning is a little off, which makes sense as the piano is strictly tempered. 

Thanks again for the comments!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On a side note, I&#8217;ve spent some time with people that claim to be &#8220;tone deaf,&#8221; and you know, from my experience, even those people can match pitch, it just takes a little extra time. So, I&#8217;m not sure &#8220;tone deaf&#8221; is the right phrase to describe them. It seems to help if you sing with them, kind of guiding them around the notes. </p>
<p>I also think ear training is so important. I&#8217;m glad you found the examples helpful.</p>
<p>Yes, accompanied singing is great! I really like singing unaccompanied. After you&#8217;ve sung that way for a while, it feels really strange to go back and sing with a piano doubling the parts, the tuning is a little off, which makes sense as the piano is strictly tempered. </p>
<p>Thanks again for the comments!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Choral blend, a better way to get it (with AUDIO SAMPLES) by Cynthia Marlette</title>
		<link>http://www.byrdensemble.com/choral-blend-a-better-way-to-get-it-with-audio-samples/#comment-1928</link>
		<dc:creator>Cynthia Marlette</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 May 2012 00:32:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.byrdensemble.com/?p=905#comment-1928</guid>
		<description>From my experience, unless they have no sense of pitch, people can learn to hear chords sung in tune; that&#039;s important ear training for a choir. Your vocal examples are brilliant when comparing the same voice singing only 20 cents off. 

I even make my praise team sing unaccompanied when we rehearse so they can better hear each other and sing in tune. It has definitely helped.

And no, no section leaders in the choir... they are followers of each other down the path to &quot;flat-dom.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From my experience, unless they have no sense of pitch, people can learn to hear chords sung in tune; that&#8217;s important ear training for a choir. Your vocal examples are brilliant when comparing the same voice singing only 20 cents off. </p>
<p>I even make my praise team sing unaccompanied when we rehearse so they can better hear each other and sing in tune. It has definitely helped.</p>
<p>And no, no section leaders in the choir&#8230; they are followers of each other down the path to &#8220;flat-dom.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Choral blend, a better way to get it (with AUDIO SAMPLES) by markdavinobenza</title>
		<link>http://www.byrdensemble.com/choral-blend-a-better-way-to-get-it-with-audio-samples/#comment-1924</link>
		<dc:creator>markdavinobenza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 07:22:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.byrdensemble.com/?p=905#comment-1924</guid>
		<description>Hi Rebekah, 

Thanks for your input. I really like the responses I&#039;m getting here. 

There are a lot of terms you&#039;ve included in your response that I think is worth unpacking, mostly because I don&#039;t know what you mean by them, so it is hard to for me to respond parts of your response.  &quot;Choral technique,&quot; &quot;vocal production issues,&quot; &quot;vocal technique&quot;  &quot;vowel alignment,&quot; &quot;vowel color.&quot;

&quot;They still want to sing and so a technique has been developed to allow conductors to mold the most number of people into the most pleasing sound they are capable of with a couple hours a week of rehearsal.&quot; 

It sounds like you are saying that there is some kind of universal method of teaching choir. Is that really true? Or are you saying that most choir directors don&#039;t talk about pitch?

&quot;I was trained as a choral conductor to generally not talk about vocal technique because honestly, many don’t have the vocabulary or familiarity with their own voices to apply what is said.&quot; 

Just so I&#039;m clear, I&#039;m saying that more attention be paid to pitch matching, which I don&#039;t equate to vocal technique. It sounds like &quot;vocal technique&quot; might mean more than that to most people. And it seems like &quot;flat&quot; and &quot;sharp&quot; are pretty easy concepts to understand.

&quot;Asking someone in that boat to sing a flat note higher leads to a strained and unpleasant sound that might fix that one pitch but results in other issues. &quot; 

Asking someone to sing a little higher (less than a half step) in my experience doesn&#039;t normally lead to a drastic change in tone quality unless the pitch in question is in an uncomfortable range for the singer.  

&quot;Between singer vibrato and pitch variation within large choral sections, tuning becomes a general game.&quot;

I&#039;m not sure what you mean here.

I think other approaches might be necessary when communicating with less experienced singers (vowel modification, bizarre imagery, whatever it takes) but those methods (if you accept that pitch is paramount) should be treated as an exercise or a way to properly correct pitch. The choir director should be explicit about how their creative methods are changing the pitch. I imagine these creative methods to be like training wheels. Unfortunately, I don&#039;t feel like directors use these methods in this way, and generally neglect expressing the importance of pitch.

Glad to hear that speaking directly about pitch to your more advanced choirs seems to be yielding good results!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Rebekah, </p>
<p>Thanks for your input. I really like the responses I&#8217;m getting here. </p>
<p>There are a lot of terms you&#8217;ve included in your response that I think is worth unpacking, mostly because I don&#8217;t know what you mean by them, so it is hard to for me to respond parts of your response.  &#8220;Choral technique,&#8221; &#8220;vocal production issues,&#8221; &#8220;vocal technique&#8221;  &#8220;vowel alignment,&#8221; &#8220;vowel color.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;They still want to sing and so a technique has been developed to allow conductors to mold the most number of people into the most pleasing sound they are capable of with a couple hours a week of rehearsal.&#8221; </p>
<p>It sounds like you are saying that there is some kind of universal method of teaching choir. Is that really true? Or are you saying that most choir directors don&#8217;t talk about pitch?</p>
<p>&#8220;I was trained as a choral conductor to generally not talk about vocal technique because honestly, many don’t have the vocabulary or familiarity with their own voices to apply what is said.&#8221; </p>
<p>Just so I&#8217;m clear, I&#8217;m saying that more attention be paid to pitch matching, which I don&#8217;t equate to vocal technique. It sounds like &#8220;vocal technique&#8221; might mean more than that to most people. And it seems like &#8220;flat&#8221; and &#8220;sharp&#8221; are pretty easy concepts to understand.</p>
<p>&#8220;Asking someone in that boat to sing a flat note higher leads to a strained and unpleasant sound that might fix that one pitch but results in other issues. &#8221; </p>
<p>Asking someone to sing a little higher (less than a half step) in my experience doesn&#8217;t normally lead to a drastic change in tone quality unless the pitch in question is in an uncomfortable range for the singer.  </p>
<p>&#8220;Between singer vibrato and pitch variation within large choral sections, tuning becomes a general game.&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure what you mean here.</p>
<p>I think other approaches might be necessary when communicating with less experienced singers (vowel modification, bizarre imagery, whatever it takes) but those methods (if you accept that pitch is paramount) should be treated as an exercise or a way to properly correct pitch. The choir director should be explicit about how their creative methods are changing the pitch. I imagine these creative methods to be like training wheels. Unfortunately, I don&#8217;t feel like directors use these methods in this way, and generally neglect expressing the importance of pitch.</p>
<p>Glad to hear that speaking directly about pitch to your more advanced choirs seems to be yielding good results!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Choral blend, a better way to get it (with AUDIO SAMPLES) by Rebekah</title>
		<link>http://www.byrdensemble.com/choral-blend-a-better-way-to-get-it-with-audio-samples/#comment-1923</link>
		<dc:creator>Rebekah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 05:52:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.byrdensemble.com/?p=905#comment-1923</guid>
		<description>Hi Mark,
I&#039;ve been thinking a lot about this especially with my Ave Renaissance Women&#039;s Choir.  In some ways, I completely agree with you.  The issue, as I see it, is that common &quot;choral technique&quot; has been born out of necessity when working with large numbers of amateur singers and limited time.  The good news is that we have large choruses of people who love to sing.  Most of them have little desire to sing solo and have neither time nor resources nor, to put it bluntly, the talent to work out their own vocal production issues.  They still want to sing and so a technique has been developed to allow conductors to mold the most number of people into the most pleasing sound they are capable of with a couple hours a week of rehearsal.  I say this as a true lover of church and community choirs and the enthusiastic people in them.  

I believe most people have a decent enough ear that they, given two examples, can discern the more in-tune of the two.  That doesn&#039;t mean they have the technique and production to do what their ear might tell them to do. There is always a &quot;why&quot; when singers sing out of tune.  I was trained as a choral conductor to generally not talk about vocal technique because honestly, many don&#039;t have the vocabulary or familiarity with their own voices to apply what is said.  Asking someone in that boat to sing a flat note higher leads to a strained and unpleasant sound that might fix that one pitch but results in other issues.  Vowel alignment seems to get folks at least on the same timbre page.  I should mention that vowel color is a whole other issue used for effect in certain repertoire.  Between singer vibrato and pitch variation within large choral sections, tuning becomes a general game.  

With all that said, in more advanced college and community groups and smaller chamber ensembles, there is little excuse for not calling a spade a spade and asking more advanced singers to make straight up pitch correction.  This is what I am trying to do in Ave with 14-18 female singers of a wide age range and from a wide variety of ability levels who want the thrill of singing renaissance polyphony in a chamber ensemble.  What I do is a mix of class voice, standard choral technique, and forthright critique-no sugarcoating.  They have to carry their own weight on the line and the only way to improve the over all sound is for singers to take control over what comes out of their own mouths and what their bodies are doing to make it happen.  It may be wishful thinking...but I think they are singing better in tune for each concert!  

There&#039;s my book on this Mark!! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Mark,<br />
I&#8217;ve been thinking a lot about this especially with my Ave Renaissance Women&#8217;s Choir.  In some ways, I completely agree with you.  The issue, as I see it, is that common &#8220;choral technique&#8221; has been born out of necessity when working with large numbers of amateur singers and limited time.  The good news is that we have large choruses of people who love to sing.  Most of them have little desire to sing solo and have neither time nor resources nor, to put it bluntly, the talent to work out their own vocal production issues.  They still want to sing and so a technique has been developed to allow conductors to mold the most number of people into the most pleasing sound they are capable of with a couple hours a week of rehearsal.  I say this as a true lover of church and community choirs and the enthusiastic people in them.  </p>
<p>I believe most people have a decent enough ear that they, given two examples, can discern the more in-tune of the two.  That doesn&#8217;t mean they have the technique and production to do what their ear might tell them to do. There is always a &#8220;why&#8221; when singers sing out of tune.  I was trained as a choral conductor to generally not talk about vocal technique because honestly, many don&#8217;t have the vocabulary or familiarity with their own voices to apply what is said.  Asking someone in that boat to sing a flat note higher leads to a strained and unpleasant sound that might fix that one pitch but results in other issues.  Vowel alignment seems to get folks at least on the same timbre page.  I should mention that vowel color is a whole other issue used for effect in certain repertoire.  Between singer vibrato and pitch variation within large choral sections, tuning becomes a general game.  </p>
<p>With all that said, in more advanced college and community groups and smaller chamber ensembles, there is little excuse for not calling a spade a spade and asking more advanced singers to make straight up pitch correction.  This is what I am trying to do in Ave with 14-18 female singers of a wide age range and from a wide variety of ability levels who want the thrill of singing renaissance polyphony in a chamber ensemble.  What I do is a mix of class voice, standard choral technique, and forthright critique-no sugarcoating.  They have to carry their own weight on the line and the only way to improve the over all sound is for singers to take control over what comes out of their own mouths and what their bodies are doing to make it happen.  It may be wishful thinking&#8230;but I think they are singing better in tune for each concert!  </p>
<p>There&#8217;s my book on this Mark!! <img src='http://www.byrdensemble.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Choral blend, a better way to get it (with AUDIO SAMPLES) by markdavinobenza</title>
		<link>http://www.byrdensemble.com/choral-blend-a-better-way-to-get-it-with-audio-samples/#comment-1922</link>
		<dc:creator>markdavinobenza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 00:30:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.byrdensemble.com/?p=905#comment-1922</guid>
		<description>Thank you for your comment Brady, I hope this encourages other people to contribute, so interested in how this ideas jives with other musicians.

I’m not sure what you mean by “vowel matching effects the way we hear pitch,” but I’m interested in hearing more about that. In Example 4, Margaret sings two totally different vowels on the same pitch and that pitch sounds pretty clear to me.

Matching vowels is a good thing to do (though I think directors pay too much attention to it), but I respectfully disagree with the idea that a chord cannot “ring” unless everyone is singing the same vowel. There are many cases in Renaissance music where not all parts are on the same vowel, but the chord still rings. What I think is more likely, is that not all notes are in their “correct” position. And that is a much more complicated but wonderful subject:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for your comment Brady, I hope this encourages other people to contribute, so interested in how this ideas jives with other musicians.</p>
<p>I’m not sure what you mean by “vowel matching effects the way we hear pitch,” but I’m interested in hearing more about that. In Example 4, Margaret sings two totally different vowels on the same pitch and that pitch sounds pretty clear to me.</p>
<p>Matching vowels is a good thing to do (though I think directors pay too much attention to it), but I respectfully disagree with the idea that a chord cannot “ring” unless everyone is singing the same vowel. There are many cases in Renaissance music where not all parts are on the same vowel, but the chord still rings. What I think is more likely, is that not all notes are in their “correct” position. And that is a much more complicated but wonderful subject:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Choral blend, a better way to get it (with AUDIO SAMPLES) by markdavinobenza</title>
		<link>http://www.byrdensemble.com/choral-blend-a-better-way-to-get-it-with-audio-samples/#comment-1921</link>
		<dc:creator>markdavinobenza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 00:29:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.byrdensemble.com/?p=905#comment-1921</guid>
		<description>Hi Cynthia!!

Thanks for your comment. What an interesting idea – that singing in tune might be easier to understand. I maybe just assumed that many choirs talk about vowels because tuning was a harder concept to teach.

Ha, very nice. If only I had anything helpful to say on that front. Do you have section leaders? It might be helpful to have at least one person with a decent sense of pitch lead others in the section.

“Open your tone,” that is a good one. I need to start a page with awesome quotes like that:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Cynthia!!</p>
<p>Thanks for your comment. What an interesting idea – that singing in tune might be easier to understand. I maybe just assumed that many choirs talk about vowels because tuning was a harder concept to teach.</p>
<p>Ha, very nice. If only I had anything helpful to say on that front. Do you have section leaders? It might be helpful to have at least one person with a decent sense of pitch lead others in the section.</p>
<p>“Open your tone,” that is a good one. I need to start a page with awesome quotes like that:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Choral blend, a better way to get it (with AUDIO SAMPLES) by Cynthia Marlette</title>
		<link>http://www.byrdensemble.com/choral-blend-a-better-way-to-get-it-with-audio-samples/#comment-1919</link>
		<dc:creator>Cynthia Marlette</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 23:44:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.byrdensemble.com/?p=905#comment-1919</guid>
		<description>What a great article. I think this is an especially good concept for the amateur church choir. They don&#039;t get the idea of vowel placement (especially if the director is untrained); singing in tune is easier to understand. 

How about an article about how to get an amateur church choir to consistently sing on pitch? I&#039;m only the accompanist, but I hear the basses consistently singing under pitch. The director&#039;s favorite line is &quot;open your tone.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a great article. I think this is an especially good concept for the amateur church choir. They don&#8217;t get the idea of vowel placement (especially if the director is untrained); singing in tune is easier to understand. </p>
<p>How about an article about how to get an amateur church choir to consistently sing on pitch? I&#8217;m only the accompanist, but I hear the basses consistently singing under pitch. The director&#8217;s favorite line is &#8220;open your tone.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Choral blend, a better way to get it (with AUDIO SAMPLES) by Brady Anderson</title>
		<link>http://www.byrdensemble.com/choral-blend-a-better-way-to-get-it-with-audio-samples/#comment-1917</link>
		<dc:creator>Brady Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 23:06:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.byrdensemble.com/?p=905#comment-1917</guid>
		<description>I agree that tuning is the most important, but I also have no doubt that vowel matching effects the way we hear a pitch. This happens because of the change in the behavior of overtones.

This is frequently demonstrated in Barbershop. A group can be singing technically in tune (much closer than 20 cents), but if their vowels aren&#039;t matching, many of the overtones do not &quot;ring&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that tuning is the most important, but I also have no doubt that vowel matching effects the way we hear a pitch. This happens because of the change in the behavior of overtones.</p>
<p>This is frequently demonstrated in Barbershop. A group can be singing technically in tune (much closer than 20 cents), but if their vowels aren&#8217;t matching, many of the overtones do not &#8220;ring&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Byrd Ensemble at Church of the Redeemer (Kenmore, WA) by Arvo Pärt&#8217;s secret sauce &#124; byrd ensemble (formerly known as the Renaissance Singers)</title>
		<link>http://www.byrdensemble.com/byrd-ensemble-at-church-of-the-redeemer-kenmore-wa/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>Arvo Pärt&#8217;s secret sauce &#124; byrd ensemble (formerly known as the Renaissance Singers)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 03:43:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.byrdensemble.com/?p=413#comment-8</guid>
		<description>[...] Shameless plug: You can hear some of Pärt&#8217;s music this Saturday, October 17, 2011 at 5pm at Church of the Redeemer. More information here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Shameless plug: You can hear some of Pärt&#8217;s music this Saturday, October 17, 2011 at 5pm at Church of the Redeemer. More information here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on We&#8217;ve changed our name by markdavinobenza</title>
		<link>http://www.byrdensemble.com/weve-changed-our-name/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>markdavinobenza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2011 22:13:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.byrdensemble.com/?p=53#comment-5</guid>
		<description>Thanks Gary!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Gary!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

